Research priorities from animal behaviour for maximising conservation progress
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Date Issued
2016Author
Greggor, Alison L.Berger-Tal, Oded
Blumstein, Daniel T.
Angeloni, Lisa
Bessa-Gomes, Carmen
Blackwell, Bradley F.
St. Clair, Colleen Cassady
Crooks, Kevin
de Silva, Shermin
Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
Goldenberg, Shifra Z.
Mesnick, Sarah L.
Owen, Megan A.
Price, Catherine J.
Saltz, David
Schell, Christopher J.
Suarez, Andrew V.
Swaisgood, Ronald R.
Winchell, Clark S.
Sutherland, William J.
Journal
Trends in Ecology & EvolutionVolume
31Issue
12Start page
953End page
964
Metadata
Show full item recordAlternative link
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534716301525Abstract
Poor communication between academic researchers and wildlife managers limits conservation progress and innovation. As a result, input from overlapping fields, such as animal behaviour, is underused in conservation management despite its demonstrated utility as a conservation tool and countless papers advocating its use. Communication and collaboration across these two disciplines are unlikely to improve without clearly identified management needs and demonstrable impacts of behavioural-based conservation management. To facilitate this process, a team of wildlife managers and animal behaviour researchers conducted a research prioritisation exercise, identifying 50 key questions that have great potential to resolve critical conservation and management problems. The resulting agenda highlights the diversity and extent of advances that both fields could achieve through collaboration.Type
ArticleRights
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.001
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).