Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Date Issued
2016Author
Senior Alistair M.Grueber, Catherine E.
Kamiya Tsukushi
Lagisz Malgorzata
O'Dwyer Katie
Santos, Eduardo S. A.
Nakagawa Shinichi
Journal
EcologyVolume
97Issue
12Start page
3293End page
3299
Metadata
Show full item recordDOI
10.1002/ecy.1591Abstract
...We reviewed 700 studies, finding 325 that used formal meta‐analysis, of which total heterogeneity was reported in fewer than 40%. We used second‐order meta‐analysis to collate heterogeneity statistics from 86 studies. Our analysis revealed that the median and mean heterogeneity, expressed as I 2, are 84.67% and 91.69%, respectively....Type
ArticleRights
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of Americaae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/ecy.1591
Scopus Count
Collections